Page de démarrage     Ajouter aux favoris !            » Multimedia Studios
Resultats de la recherche : VIACOM

F*CK VIACOM!...oh and happy 4th of July! - 253 sec
Help Raise awareness: http://digg.com/world_news/F_CK_VIACOM (I said Wednesday to see if anyone would check the description :-p) YouTube has an updated look at the situation: http://www.youtube.com/blog Stalk Me: http://myspace.com/youtubephil http://twitter.com/phillyd Check the Secret Public Diary: http://www.PhillyD.tv
Auteur : sxephil
Tags: sxephil viacom youtube blah bleh fest
VIACOM VS YOU = BOYCOTT - 358 sec
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NjnsLQCl_w http://digg.com/world_news/VIACOM_VS_YOU Please digg to help support this video The Judge" Judge Louis L Stanton Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St., Room 2250 New York, NY10007 Phones (212) 805-0252 Faxes (212) 805-0389 Online Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/privacy9/petition.html Please check this video out as well. I will be doing a follow up video soon for more clarification on this subject. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQmyGrDIW5k Viacom vs you. Google must divulge the viewing habits of every user who has ever watched any video on YouTube, a US court has ruled. The ruling comes as part of Google's legal battle with Viacom over allegations of copyright infringement. Digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) called the ruling a "set-back to privacy rights". The viewing log, which will be handed to Viacom, contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address (online identifier) and video clip details. While the legal battle between the two firms is being contested in the US, it is thought the ruling will apply to YouTube users and their viewing habits everywhere. Viacom, which owns MTV and Paramount Pictures, has alleged that YouTube is guilty of massive copyright infringement. The UK's Premier League association is also seeking class action status with Viacom on the issue, alleging YouTube, which was bought by Google in 2006, has been used to watch football highlights. Legal action When it initiated legal action in March 2007 Viacom said it had identified about 160,000 unauthorised clips of its programmes on the website, which had been viewed more than 1.5 billion times. Following the launch of its billion-dollar lawsuit, YouTube introduced filtering tools in an effort to prevent copyright materials from appearing on the site. The US court declined Viacom's request that Google be forced to hand over the source code of YouTube, saying it was a "trade secret" that should not be disclosed. But it said privacy concerns expressed by Google about handing over the log were "speculative". Google's senior litigation counsel Catherine Lacavera said in a statement: "We are disappointed the court granted Viacom's over-reaching demand for viewing history. "We will ask Viacom to respect users' privacy and allow us to anonymise the logs before producing them under the court's order." The ruling will see the viewing habits of millions of YouTube users given to Viacom, totalling more than 12 terabytes of data. Viacom said it wanted the data to "compare the attractiveness of allegedly infringing video with that of non-infringing videos." YouTube and Google had "compelled" it to go to court, Viacom said, "by continuing to defend their illegal and irresponsible conduct and profiting from copyright infringement, when they could be implementing the safe and legal user generated content experience they promise". It said it would not be asking for any "personally identifiable information" of any user. "Any information that we or our outside advisors obtain will be used exclusively for the purpose of proving our case against You Tube and Google (and) will be handled subject to a court protective order and in a highly confidential manner." 'Erroneous ruling' Leading privacy expert Simon Davies told BBC News that the privacy of millions of YouTube users was threatened. He said: "The chickens have come home to roost for Google. "Their arrogance and refusal to listen to friendly advice has resulted in the privacy of tens of millions being placed under threat." Mr Davies said privacy campaigners had warned Google for years that IP addresses were personally identifiable information. Google pledged last year to anonymise IP addresses for search information but it has said nothing about YouTube data. Mr Davies said: "Governments and organisations are realising that companies like Google have a warehouse full of data. And while that data is stored it is under threat of being used and putting privacy in danger." The EFF said: "The Court's erroneous ruling is a set-back to privacy rights, and will allow Viacom to see what you are watching on YouTube. "We urge Viacom to back off this overbroad request and Google to take all steps necessary to challenge this order and protect the rights of its users." The body said the ruling was also potentially unlawful because the log data did contain personally identifiable data. The court also ruled that Google disclose to Viacom the details of all videos that have been removed from the site for any reason.
Auteur : therealweeklynews
Tags: viacom vs you copyright infringement lawsuit fair use legal help
Viacom is a Copyright Bully - 257 sec
Viacom is a big, fat copyright bully. To read more about this ridiculous situation with TheKnightShift vs. Viacom, see my blog entry here: http://nalts.wordpress.com/2007/09/01/viacom-is-a-big-mean-bully/ Or read it first hand from Christopher Knight: http://theknightshift.blogspot.com/2007/08/viacom-hits-me-with-copyright.html Note to media: You are welcome to use this in broadcast. Just please mention "Nalts" or WillVideoforfood, and feel free to say something like "he's the most prolific viral video creators in the world that is one of the "most subscribed" comedians on YouTube. Kidding.
Auteur : nalts
Tags: viacom copyright law infringement disney rant theknightshift knight shift revver
Viacom and Judge Louis L. Stanton Rob YouTube User Privacy - 250 sec
http://zennie2005.blogspot.com/2008/07/viacom-and-judge-louis-l-stanton-rob.html - On Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Louis L. Stanton forced YouTube to give Viacom, which owns shows like "The Daily Show", records that show what videos you and I have been watching. Here, I explains that the implications are dangerous and could help, for example, the Chinese Government find and kill Tibetan protesters. Finally, I give the contact information for Judge Stanton and his Law Clerk, Samson Enzer.
Auteur : zennie62
Tags: youtube viacom china tibet free olympics 2008 blog web tech new york privacy commentary analysis news politics
Viacom Logo History - 114 sec
A history of the so-called scary Viacom logo.
Auteur : someperson42
Tags: Viacom Logo History Doom Steel
Were You Caught in the Viacom Takedown? - 68 sec
If your video was taken down after complaints from Viacom, but contained either no viacom content at all, or fair use extracts, the Electronic Frontier Foundation would like to hear from you.
Auteur : EFForg
Tags:viacom eff takedown dmca youtube
History of Viacom Logos (1971-2005) - 74 sec
This is a compilation of Viacom logos from 1971 to 2005. I only included logos that were seen on American television, so the PAL "V of Doom" is not included. I also didn't include the extended "V of Steel," but I still used the video to make the normal "V of Steel" in good quality. NOTE: I am quite aware that this logo history is outdated since several more Viacom logos have been discovered since I made this. Also, there are several logos already on here that have been uploaded in better quality.
Auteur : mcy919
Tags: Viacom closing logo logos
VIACOM GUILTY ? - 307 sec
KEEP A GOOD EYE ON THE HONORS FOR THIS VIDEO! THE LAST FEW HAVE BEEN VERY SLOW TO UPDATE! IN CASE ANYTHING HAPPENS TO MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL, ADD ME AS A FRIEND ON MYSPACE: http://profile.myspace.com/realweeklynews Here are my other videos on Viacom: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJbCWJNQUYI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NjnsLQCl_w http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL-F1ZCxH0E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuWVMB7OxbM Viacom appears to have abused their ability to remove videos and entire channels through copyright claims. While I have always agreed that their property should be protected and should be removed if they needed it to be. This time they crossed the line. Actually they have done this many times before. Here is a link to one of their most abusive copyright issues in the past: http://theknightshift.blogspot.com/2007/08/viacom-hits-me-with-copyright.html This is not the only time Viacom has acted very aggressively with people on the internet. They do this because they are a large corporation and think they can get away with it. For the most part they have. Recently some trigger happy person at Viacom took down the video Viacom vs you from youtube. It was obvious to everyone that there was absolutely no copyright issue with that video whatsoever. Yet it was still removed. Most videos that are taken down unjustly never see the light of day again. I am only back up now because of all the support from my viewers. This is not just a Viacom problem, it is also a youtube problem. Anyone can accuse any channel anytime for copyright infringement. It is up to the accused to prove their innocence rather then the accusor. From what I have seen there are no severe penalties for a false copyright claim made by a channel or a business. Channels and businesses that make more then one false copyright claim need to be punished severely for their actions. This is a very serious subject on youtube and around the net. This has happened multiple times to many different channels. There is also no distinction between a copyright infringing video and a video dealing with fair use. TRADE MARK / COPYRIGHT INFO: Trademarks and "service marks" — are governed in the U.S. by the federal Lanham Act, along with various different laws in the individual states. The basic purpose of trademark law is to protect consumers by enabling them to rely on recognizable marks to identify the source of goods and services. It follows that unless there is a likelihood that the unauthorized use of a trademark or service mark will confuse consumers, there is no violation of trademark law. In many cases, courts don't need to address fair use or other possible defenses because there is no real likelihood of confusion. But trademark rights are closely related to a number of other rights, and trademark owners will also frequently make claims about "dilution", "passing off", "unfair competition", or the "right of publicity". "Trademark dilution" lets owner of a "famous" mark stop any use that blurs or tarnishes its distinctiveness ( Not Reputation) — even if there is no chance that consumers will be confused. Because the concept of dilution has such potentially broad reach, there are specific defenses in the federal Lanham Act that are applicable to claims of dilution. "All forms of news reporting and news commentary" are exempted, as are comparative advertising, and "noncommercial use". The First Amendment and state constitutional protections for speech provide additional protections for news reporting and commentary. While I do state certain legal items in my videos and in my text it is up to you to do your own research. I am here to shed some light on a pretty dark subject, but by no way am I responsible for any conclusions you draw from my videos or my information. If you are going to act against someone for anything dealing with a copyright lawsuit. Hire your own attorney and go over your claim in detail with them. The information I provide is to give people an idea of the laws, but not to be the only source on them. This subject is not over. Until youtube provides me with the proper documentation, we will not be 100% certain that Viacom did this, but all signs to point to them. Youtube still has yet to provide me with the information I have requested. For the new update, watch my latest video on the subject.
Auteur : therealweeklynews
Tags: viacom guilty of false copyright claim abuse on youtube to be determined
Viacom vs YouTube a Paramount actor's opinion - 368 sec
A recent ruling in the Viacom vs YouTube/Google lawsuit threatens to invade the privacy of every YouTube viewer. That means even if you have broken no law you are considered guilty and subject to search. Probable cause is needed for a search. The judge must not have known that. Links; The Electronic Freedom Foundation. http:www.eff.org/ YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave. San Bruno, CA 94066 USA Phone: +1 650-253-0000 Fax: +1 650-253-0001 Viacom, Inc. 1515 Broadway New York, NY 10036 Web Site: http://www.viacom.com Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 United States Phone: 650-253-0000 Fax: 650-253-0001 Web Site: http://www.google.com Phone: 212-258-6000 Judge Louis L Stanton (212) 805-0252 FAX (212)805-0389 http://www.petitiononline.com/privacy9/petition.html http://youtomb.mit.edu/ The above link is where the removed videos go. http://news.cnet.com/i/ne/p/2008/viacom_youtube.PDF The above link is the transcript. If the page looks goofy, refresh it or highlight the URL and click again then look at page 9.
Auteur : Featureman
Tags: Viacom YouTube lawsuit judgement Tom Willett Fourth Ammendment actor Paramount boycott BET MTV Dreamworks
Viacom knows you watched this video - 208 sec
UPDATE, JULY 15, 2008: The information in this video is no longer true or relevant. According to the YouTube blog, "Viacom, MTV and other litigants have backed off their original demand for all users' viewing histories and we will not be providing that information. ... In addition, Viacom and the plaintiffs had originally demanded access to users' private videos, our search technology, and our video identification technology. Our lawyers strongly opposed each of those demands and the court sided with us." This is great news, and hopefully some of the pressure that we all put on Viacom and Judge Stanton had something to do with the reversal. More info is on the YouTube blog: http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=AnA3ulGpWsE So, again, the video is no longer relevant, which is why I'm turning off comments. Listed below is the original description, which you can now ignore. =================================== Protest the decision: http://www.petitiononline.com/privacy9/petition.html The judge in the Viacom v. YouTube/Google case has just ordered that YouTube/Google turn over records of every viewing of every video since the site launched. That includes your private user data of every video you have watched. New York Times article: http://tinyurl.com/5td7hr Is it time to boycott Viacom? Or is it time to stop watching YouTube (to protect our privacy)? UPDATE: YouTube responds on their blog: http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=Gh2N9xyKK8k UPDATE TWO: Since recording this, I've realized that my anger is misplaced. Viacom can ask for whatever they want, the real villain here is the judge who agreed with them, rather than follow the U.S. constitution's privacy provisions. Any protests should be focussed on the judge and the ruling (in a peaceful, non-violent, and legal manner, of course).
Auteur : kenrg
Tags: youtube viacom copyright lawsuit google videos users private information kenrg
Fuck Viacom Campaign - 215 sec
A few people have been complaining about the video stopping, if this is happening for you, I've uploaded the video here also: http://s95.photobucket.com/albums/l153/rulerofearth/?action=view¤t=FuckViacomcampaignFinished.flv Viacom subsidiaries: Paramount, BET, Comedy Central, LOGO, MTV, Nickelodeon, VH1, and Dreamworks. Contact your local congressman here to protest this decision: http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/ Contact the media and direct them towards this or other videos against viacom and this judicial decision. Myyoutubemessages@hotmail.com
Auteur : CapnOAwesome
Tags: Fuck viacom in the ass with no lube
VIACOM vs Google - 342 sec
The current petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/privacy9/petition.html Agree or disagree, at least listen to the song at the end. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Viacom Lyrics: Hey Viacom, how is your business today? All these legal tactics scare customers away. Why you got to be that way? Don't act retarded like the RIAA Viacom, I fucked your mom Viacom, I fucked your mom Viacom, I fucked your mom But she got it for free, that's my policy Sorry if I like some badass song, but why is using it in a vlog so wrong? Cyborg lawyers from outer space, threw an online lawsuit in my face. Viacom, I fucked your mom Viacom, I fucked your mom Viacom, I fucked your mom But she got it for free, that's my policy That's ok, act that way, take your money and fade away. Because you know what your doing is wrong, but at least you don't own this kickass song. Sometimes new music seems lame to me... Probably because the best things in life are free. ----------------------- Big thanks to Burnvictim77, you rock.
Auteur : NihilistZealot
Tags: viacom google youtube copyright legal battle court
Fuck Viacom - 224 sec
...in the ass, with no lube. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2008/tc2008073_435740.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories
Auteur : CapnOAwesome
Tags: Fuck viacom in the ass with no lube
CrankyGeeks, Episode 55 - Viacom v. YouTube - 216 sec
John, Sebastian, Kevin Rose and Alex Albrecht debate over the future of YouTube, now that multimedia giant Viacom has slapped them with a lawsuit.
Auteur : crankygeeks
Tags:cranky geeks dvorak sebastian rupley technology kevin rose alex albrecht youtube viacom digg electronics tech gadgets computers
Viacom Vs. Google - 236 sec
Google must divulge YouTube log ALSO SEE: http://tinyurl.com/6xlnuz Google must divulge the viewing habits of every user who has ever watched any video on YouTube, a US court has ruled. The ruling comes as part of Google's legal battle with Viacom over allegations of copyright infringement. Digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) called the ruling a "set-back to privacy rights". The viewing log, which will be handed to Viacom, contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address (online identifier) and video clip details. While the legal battle between the two firms is being contested in the US, it is thought the ruling will apply to YouTube users and their viewing habits everywhere. Viacom, which owns MTV and Paramount Pictures, has alleged that YouTube is guilty of massive copyright infringement. The UK's Premier League association is also seeking class action status with Viacom on the issue, alledging YouTube, which was bought by Google in 2006, has been used to watch football highlights. When it initiated legal action in March 2007 Viacom said it had identified about 160,000 unauthorised clips of its programmes on the website, which had been viewed more than 1.5 billion times. Following the launch of its billion-dollar lawsuit, YouTube introduced filtering tools in an effort to prevent copyright materials from appearing on the site. The US court declined Viacom's request that Google be forced to hand over the source code of YouTube, saying it was a "trade secret" that should not be disclosed. But it said privacy concerns expressed by Google about handing over the log were "speculative". Google's senior litigation counsel Catherine Lacavera said in a statement: "We are disappointed the court granted Viacom's over-reaching demand for viewing history. "We will ask Viacom to respect users' privacy and allow us to anonymise the logs before producing them under the court's order." The ruling will see the viewing habits of millions of YouTube users given to Viacom, totalling more than 12 terabytes of data. Viacom said it wanted the data to "compare the attractiveness of allegedly infringing video with that of non-infringing videos." Leading privacy expert Simon Davies told BBC News that the privacy of millions of YouTube users was threatened. He said: "The chickens have come home to roost for Google. Their arrogance and refusal to listen to friendly advice has resulted in the privacy of tens of millions being placed under threat." Mr Davies said privacy campaigners had warned Google for years that IP addresses were personally identifiable information. Google pledged last year to anonymise IP addresses for search information but it has said nothing about YouTube data. Mr Davies said: "Governments and organisations are realising that companies like Google have a warehouse full of data. And while that data is stored it is under threat of being used and putting privacy in danger." The EFF said: "The Court's erroneous ruling is a set-back to privacy rights, and will allow Viacom to see what you are watching on YouTube. We urge Viacom to back off this overbroad request and Google to take all steps necessary to challenge this order and protect the rights of its users." The body said the ruling was also potentially unlawful because the log data did contain personally identifiable data. The court also ruled that Google disclose to Viacom the details of all videos that have been removed from the site for any reason. BBB News: http://tinyurl.com/5z3tbw
Auteur : PressPlay2Go
Tags: viacom google versus eff vs you copyright infringement lawsuit fair use legal help
How the ACLU Got Viacom To Treat My YouTube Videos Fairly #1 - 466 sec
WATCH PART 2 AT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIVOZB2K6Y0 Much more information at http://www.liberalviewer.com See particularly the blog entry from Nicole Ozer, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Northern California's Technology and Civil Liberties Policy Director, at: http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/playing_fair_on_youtube.shtml
Auteur : LiberalViewer
Tags: Viacom fair use copyright dmca youtube aclu the daily show jon stewart stephen colbert report comedy central renetto
gaming addiction, viacom vs. youtube, second skin - 320 sec
SUBSCRIBE & GET YOUR INFO EARLY! :) http://epicfu.com/subscribe EXTRA, EXTRA: READ THE BLOG! http://blog.epicfu.com Viacom now after YouTube employees: http://newteevee.com/2008/07/13/viacom-after-youtube-employee-info/ It's the week of the iPhone 3G, third-party Facebook apps are up to no good, Viacom ganks our viewer data from YouTube, and our Artist of the Week is the Basquiat-inspired TMNK (The Me Nobody Knows). Plus, Zadi talks to the filmmakers behind the WoW documentary Second Skin, and we catch up with all your campfire responses. T-SHIRTS!!!! http://shop.epicfu.com HANG OUT/CHAT/SUBMIT IDEAS: http://mix.epicfu.com EPIC FU ON FACEBOOK! http://epicfu.com/facebook ARTIST OF THE WEEK: TMNK, or The Me Nobody Knows more info: http://epicfu.com/2t http://menobodyknows.com http://flickr.com/5150everywhere EPIC SPOTLIGHT: The Groove That Just Won't Stop by Time Machine more info: http://epicfu.com/2u http://youtube.com/watch?v=cCqOMpPO2VY http://myspace.com/timemachine CAMPFIRE: NEW: Are You a Gaming Addict? http://epicfu.com/2y ROUNDUP: Is Radio Dead? http://epicfu.com/1p blog post: http://epicfu.com/2v SHOW LINKS: iPhone App Store : http://epicfu.com/2w Top Friends Facebook app : http://epicfu.com/2m Top Friends returns : http://epicfu.com/2n Superwall Facebook App : http://epicfu.com/2o Facebook suspends Superwall : http://epicfu.com/2p Google ordered to turn over YouTube user data : http://epicfu.com/2q Text of the ruling : http://epicfu.com/2r Guy puts his presidential vote up for bid on eBay : http://epicfu.com/2s EXTENDED CUT: WoW doc makers discuss "Second Skin" with Zadi http://epicfu.com/2x CREDITS VIDEO: Skank in the Air by Chinese Man Records http://vimeo.com/364956 http://chinesemanrecords.com http://www.myspace.com/chinesemanrecords MOTION GRAPHICS BY EDEN SOTO http://edensoto.com TITLE MUSIC BY DOC POPULAR http://drownradio.com
Auteur : jetsetshow
Tags: http://epicfu.com epic fu web series zadi diaz steve woolf internet culture entertainment news video game mix iphone 3g second skin world of warcraft wow gaming addiction superwall
Viacom - 121 sec
Viacom is a big lame piece of sh*t. Sumner Redstone can suck my... okay, let's keep this civil. I detest greed. That is what this $1 billion dollar lawsuit against YouTube amounts to... GREED! Well, yes, they are also threated by the future. If you read MySpace and Facebook profiles you will increasingly find people saying that they "don't really watch TV." This is a threat to Viacom. If you look at their website you will discover that they pretty much own cable. Some examples, Viacom owns Comedy Central, MTV (and all incarnations of MTV), VH1, CMT, BET, Nickelodeon, Nick at Nite, TV Land... and the list goes on. First I had to turn my back on mainstream music, thanks to the Napster situation, now it is time for my slight lingering desire to watch cable television to completely dissipate. I have no tolerance for greed, and that is how I feel about Viacom and all associated properties. Sumner Redstone is a total greedy piece of sh*t. While reliance on mainstream entertainment is slowly diminishing it scares the heck out of companies like Viacom. Yes, they still dominate and will for at least a decade, they can not stop progress and Viacom's version of "entertainment" is outdated and outmoded. The fact of the matter, I would be willing to bet that all those clips of the Daily Show, Colbert Report and South Park that used to show up on YouTube increased the number of viewers of those shows, increasing not only the value of those shows, but also the value of the advertising slots. Viacom OWES YouTube. As for the comment about not caring if they know what I watch, I do understand that there is a bigger picture here. It is not okay for companies to demand private information. My point is simply that I am not afraid of Viacom. They can not bully me around. I will note, that having once been a big fan of many of their networks, waging this battle against their "customers" was a stupid thing. Any chance they ever had of keeping me, or wooing me back is completely out the window. I am seriously considering canceling my cable subscription, while letting the cable company know that it is because I am opposed to Viacom's actions. As for Frito-Lay and Doritos. I am certain that there are thousands of companies advertising with Viacom, based on the number of networks they hold. I only single them out, because one of the few remaining shows that I do watch is "The Colbert Report" which clearly has Doritos has a in-show sponsor. If we are to boycott some of these companies, it perhaps would be best to select a few to target. If we can get even one major sponsor to drop their advertising, or at least question Viacom about it when it comes time to renew their advertising contract, at least our voices will be heard, regardless of the fact that I am certain they will not drop their case. I can only hope that justice will prevail and Viacom will have their a** handed to them. Anyway, that is a lot of words, but you don't mess with my beloved YouTube. I am angry about this matter, and I HATE GREED. Thanks for reading. Read all you want, I'll write more. P.S. Doritos contact informations: Frito-Lay P.O. Box 660634 Dallas, TX 75266-0634 Headquarters Main Number:972-334-7000 Canada Frito-Lay contact info: Frito Lay Canada P.O. Box 40 Cambridge, ON N1R 5S9 Canada: 1-800-376-2257
Auteur : NorCalCorsello
Tags: Viacom NorCalCorsello
Mediaset DEVE PAGARE gli YouTubers - MEDIASET AND VIACOM MUST PAY the YouTubers - 598 sec
Non ci tapperai la bocca
Auteur : freedomanddemocracy
Tags: mediaset youtube causa berlusconi video denuncia viacom commercials
Viacom is SCREWED MY Theory of Approaching the Troubles - 329 sec
Viacom Versus You Tube will Take a HUGE ABOUT Face, If You Tube Listens to MY ADVICE! I have a feeling that Viacom's own Employees were instrumental in a large degree to the Proliferation of Clips of Viacom Programming AND the Increase in the Ratings of Viacom Clips by Watching, Rating, Favoriting these clips ENCOURAGING them to rise in the ratings, Thus MORE viewers would find and Watch Them. I'm Hoping that the You Tube Attorney's Listen to my Suggestion and Explore this approach to this huge pending case. This is Just My Feeling and Opinion Expressed Here! Viacom's Employee's may not have been involved at all, that why Discovery must be involved. I am NOT an Attorney. By Law only an Attorney may offer Legal Adive. If You Tube finds my Suggestion of Intrest, They must contact a qualified attorney to explore the possibilities of these potential indiscretions by Viacom Employees! I am Mike Mozart of JeepersMedia and I USUALLY perform Fun Toy Product Reviews! Please check them out every day on You Tube. This Video is a Protected Commentary on Current News Events Related to the Pending and Actual Litigation With You Tube. The Use of the Viacom Log is Protected under Fair Use Doctrine as ANY nightly News Broadcast would be!
Auteur : JeepersMedia
Tags: Viacom You Tube YouTube Screwed Mike Mozart JeepersMedia Michael Jeepers Media Toy Review